AHIMA supports the use of public policy to encourage the collection, access, sharing, and use of social determinants of health (SDoH) to enrich clinical decision-making and improve health outcomes, public health, and health inequities in ways that are culturally respectful. To inform policy development, Health Information (HI) professionals have considerable knowledge and expertise in protecting, managing, and ensuring the accuracy of data about individuals. To improve the collection, access, sharing and use of SDoH data, AHIMA believes that public policy must:
Policy must identify a set of standard concepts and definitions for SDoH. Identification of existing medical coding vocabulary gaps is also needed to document and capture standardized SDoH data elements. Policy must also ensure that the processes for updating vocabularies and code sets routinely includes consideration of SDoH data needs. Finally, policy must prioritize a set of standardized data elements to be included in electronic health records (EHRs). This includes the development and testing of consensus-based standards to enable the electronic exchange of SDoH data.
Policy must leverage patient-centered care models such as CMS’ CMMI Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model to incentivize the incorporation of SDoH data into care decisions.
Policy must encourage providers to be transparent and communicate clearly about the purposes for which SDoH data is being collected and used, while raising awareness of how different patient populations may participate in the collection and use of SDoH data.
Generation of SDoH data is not exclusive to clinical settings. As clinical and non-clinical settings increasingly share data, policy must encourage a digitally secure infrastructure to support functional, structural, and semantic interoperability between both settings. In addition, policy must embrace data governance policies to support data sharing and data integrity, while promoting positive referral feedback loops to enhance care coordination.
Sharing of SDoH data across clinical and non-clinical organizations requires consideration of privacy issues, including consent management and the appropriate sharing of information (while ensuring that only the minimum necessary information is exchanged and limited to the specific transaction in question). This includes consideration of privacy and security issues that arise when collecting and sharing electronic health information outside of the scope of HIPAA. Policy must also consider addressing the problem of patient identification to ensure the confidentiality, privacy, and security of an individual’s clinical and non-clinical information.
Including how to accurately and consistently collect and ask about such information with cultural humility and sensitivity; how SDoH data should be used in the clinical setting; and how to maintain confidentiality when working with community based-organizations and service providers.
Developing social risk profiles based on SDoH data may lead to discrimination, stigmatization, and implicit bias. It could also limit access to care options, exacerbate poor outcomes and existing health inequities, and impede data integrity. Policy must safeguard against the perpetuation or aggravation of such occurrences.
New standards and approaches must recognize the crucial role of HI professionals in the standardization, capture, exchange, use, and analysis of SDoH data to improve the health of individuals and communities while ensuring privacy and security protections.
Social determinants of health are “conditions in the environment in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of life outcomes and risks.” A growing body of evidence suggests that these upstream factors impact the health of individuals and communities. To improve outcomes and health equity, more attention must be given to social determinants. The recent shift in healthcare towards value-based care models that incentivize prevention and promote improved outcomes for individuals and populations offers an opportunity to consider approaches and partnerships that address health-related factors upstream from the clinical encounter.
However, the appropriate capture, use, exchange and sharing of SDoH data remains a challenge. Social risk factors are often not documented in the EHR and existing codes to capture SDoH data are not widely used.3 This includes connectivity and integration between EHRs and community-based organizations and service providers which remains limited. As policymakers seek to address this critical issue, AHIMA members have the expertise to offer insight.
Enhanced interest in leveraging SDoH data has led to more measures of different social risk factors and indicators. However, lack of agreement on which data to collect and lack of data standardization has limited the collection and sharing of SDoH, often leading to confusion about the tools available to providers. New approaches must prioritize which social risk factors should be captured for interventional purposes, how they should best be captured using the various medical coding vocabulary standards and promulgated as an industry standard for capturing the social risk factor in question.
Lack of digital infrastructure and robust technical capabilities to support functional, structural and semantic interoperability across clinical and community-based organizations and service providers.
Successful approaches today that integrate social needs with clinical care are often manual information exchanges, human-capital intensive, involve unstructured data, and may lack consistency or data standardization within or between health and social care settings.
New approaches must maintain the ability of providers to be good stewards of patient information including identifying patients accurately and ensuring that data sharing supports patient privacy, while allowing for appropriate sharing of information with community partners in ways that are respectful of individuals’ privacy and are culturally sensitive.
New approaches to integrating SDoH into healthcare delivery may require additional workforce training as well as a more diverse and culturally competent workforce.
New approaches must expressly prohibit the use of social risk profiles or other information to be used for discriminatory purposes, stigmatization, implicit bias, or in decisions that limit care options, lead to poor outcomes and exacerbate existing health inequities.
Want to read the full statement or share it with your colleagues?
January 5, 2021
AHIMA calls for the incoming administration to consider the implications of health information as they begin to implement new health policies in 2021.
January 4, 2021
In this episode of HI Pitch, Lauren Riplinger, AHIMA's vice president of advocacy, public policy and government affairs, reviews the seven policy statements released by AHIMA in 2020.
AHIMA Advocacy in Action - Social Determinants of Health
December 18, 2020
AHIMA sent a letter to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology supporting The Gravity Project’s submission to add social determinants of health as a new data class to the US Core for Data Interoperability (USCDI) v2.
Webinar | 1 CEU
Learn about the value and challenges of collecting and using data on SDOH, including the current status of national efforts to advance SDOH data standards, policy considerations and different approaches for using SDOH data to improve patient care across the industry.
December 7, 2020
AHIMA announced today its Board of Directors has approved a new policy statement on the subject of SDoH – the economic and social conditions that influence the health and quality of life of individuals and populations.